ILLUSTRATION: ©La Tribune
On 29 August, La Tribune published an article on the outcome of the public consultation organised this summer by the PyrĂ©nĂ©es-Orientales Departmental Council regarding a possible name change for the region. Christophe Alaux, Director of the Chair in Attractiveness and New Territorial Marketing (IMPGT â Aix-Marseille University), was asked to shed light on the territorial marketing issues raised by this initiative.
A consultation with a close result
Between 22 June and 15 August, residents of the PyrĂ©nĂ©es-Orientales were invited to vote on three options: to retain the current name, or to opt for âPyrĂ©nĂ©es MĂ©diterranĂ©eâ or âPyrĂ©nĂ©es Catalanesâ. This initiative was in response to a campaign promise made by the President of the Departmental Council, Hermeline Malherbe, who wished to bring the regionâs name into line with its Catalan identity.
Out of 38,178 votes cast, the current name ultimately won with 47.21 per cent of the vote, ahead of âPyrĂ©nĂ©es Catalanesâ (42.15 per cent) and âPyrĂ©nĂ©es MĂ©diterranĂ©e â (10.64 per cent) â a close result which, according to Hermeline Malherbe, nevertheless demonstrates a strong attachment to the regionâs Catalan identity.
The name: an established brand asset
When asked about the real impact of such a change, Christophe Alaux pointed out that the issue of identity must not overshadow the reputation the region has already built up. Drawing on the ©IMAGETERR study, conducted every two years by the Chair amongst 3,200 French people regarding their preferred holiday destinations, he emphasised that the PyrĂ©nĂ©es-Orientales are among the most frequently cited regions â just behind Provence and FinistĂšre, and ahead of Morbihan and Aix-en-Provence â evidence of spontaneous recognition and a brand that is already well established.
It also points out that economic stakeholders and investors base their decisions primarily on concrete fundamentals: the market, land, labour force â rather than the administrative name of a department, and that, in the context of tourism, it is often sub-departmental brands (such as Collioure or Banyuls, in this case) that drive a regionâs appeal.
A recurring issue, rarely resolved without controversy
The article places this episode within the broader history of attempts at territorial renaming in France: from Mayenne-et-Loire, which became Maine-et-Loire in 1791, to the CĂŽtes-du-Nord, renamed CĂŽtes-dâArmor in 1990, including resounding failures such as âSeptimanieâ, proposed without consultation by Georges FrĂȘche in 2004, or âMontpellier Unlimitedâ in 2012. These examples all illustrate the difficulty of reaching a consensus on a regional name, and the importance of linking any branding project to a substantive strategy rather than to a single communication campaign.
Our readers are also interested by
Study Tour du Master 2 ANMT
La Boussole de lâĂ©quilibre territorial mobilisĂ©e lors dâun CafĂ© Ambassadeur de Reims LĂ©gendâR
Comité d'orientation 2025
Le tourisme, dĂ©sormais au cĆur de lâattractivitĂ© territoriale : une intervention de Christophe Alaux